What Feeds Family Conflict?

By Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, R.N., B.S.N., Attorney at Law

There are a lot of kinds of conflict, but some of the very worst are the kind that occur in families. Why is this? A long history of interacting in ways that don’t work, family members who are totally closed to change, lack of self-awareness and self-understanding, and fear are among the things that can maintain patterns of conflict for years on end.

Psychology teaches us that all behavior is motivated. That is to say, from that perspective, everything we do comes from some reason, some conscious or unconscious place within. If people behave unreasonably, there is a cause for their behavior. Knowing that may not change a thing about family conflict, but it can help us deal with it a little better. Dealing with family conflict is essential as our elders age and family members have to step up and make decisions about aging parents.  Everyone may not get along so well in this situation.

In our practice of elder mediation, fear seems to be the single biggest motivator that drives the conflicts we see. It can be fear around money, or control, or change. It can be fear of being found out, exposed. It can be fear of being asked to do something one is not competent or willing to do. It is one of the most basic of human emotions, but an emotion that causes extreme self-protective reactions. These reactions sometimes manifest in strong words, violent behavior, or generally hostile contact with others.
Mediators work to help participants at mediation find ways to agree and to make compromises. The stronger a participant’s fear, the more difficult it is for that person to give in to anything, or to make agreements that touch upon his or her fear.

What can we do about all this? Perhaps we can start by recognizing that no one enjoys being horribly difficult at mediation or any time. Behaving badly is simply what shows on the outside. What just might be on the inside is a person frightened of losing control, security, money, the family home, an inheritance, the right to make decisions, or anything.

Compassion and understanding can do a lot to uplift the process of working with persons who are showing their worst side in a dispute. It does not change the difficult person’s behavior, but it can cause the whole tone of a mediation to soften. Understanding that emotion feeds conflict can cause one to step back and try to imagine what it is like to be the person who is acting out.

If one is able to imagine that, to “walk in someone else’s shoes” for the moment, it makes it a lot easier to compromise or try to figure out what would work for that difficult person. I guess you can call it being a little less selfish in a dispute.

It works. This, of course doesn’t apply only to mediation of disputes involving elders. It’s a general concept, and can apply to any kind of conflict. Difficult as it is to see the other’s side of the story in any clash of ideas, working at doing just that is essential to getting things resolved.

At the risk of sounding too philosophical here, I conclude that elder mediation can uplift us if we are willing to put forth the effort to stop thinking of only our own point of view. It’s not easy. The upside to the effort is that your dispute could be over with, or at least down to a workable level. Were we all able to see past the specifics of a family conflict to the underlying emotions we would surely be more peaceful.

To learn more about family conflicts and aging loved ones, sign up for our free newsletter at http://www.AgingParents.com.

© 2009, AgingParents.com

By Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, R.N., B.S.N., Attorney

What can a family do when the person who seems to be the focal point of a conflict refuses to mediate the dispute? Other than trying to persuade the reluctant one to try it, there is no way to force anyone to mediation. It is a purely voluntary process. Without cooperation from everyone involved, the chances of success are zero.

Sometimes, there is a misconception that the mediator is going to tell someone that they are wrong, or tell the difficult person what to do. Unfortunately, that shouldn’t happen in mediation. Mediators are neutral. That means, they don’t take sides. If the mediator tells the person in question that he or she is wrong, that immediately takes the mediator onto a side and out of the middle.

In my litigation career, I attended countless mediations as an advocate for my clients. I advocated for their positions. The lawyer on the other side advocated for her or his clients’ positions. The mediators who were good at the job of mediation invited each of us to look at the conflict (a legal case) from a different point of view. The mediator suggested a possible compromise, pointed out the weaknesses in our analysis or position, and often did exactly the same with the other side when we were in a separate room.

I also saw terrible mediators, whose work was so lacking in neutrality that I resented paying the mediator’s fee. One mediator took on my client and argued with him, heatedly, trying to get my client to change his viewpoint of the value of the case. That mediation failed.

Mediation of family conflicts is a special arena, which should be reserved for mediators who understand family dynamics and respect all or both sides. Big egos who try to force a change in thinking from the parties are likely to alienate them. Success at mediation of family conflicts starts with getting all parties, including the reluctant ones, to the table to begin the conversation.

Reluctant parties can change their minds. It happens at mediation every day. But no one will do that if he or she feels forced into it.

Learn more about mediating family disputes in How to Handle Family Conflicts About Elders, from The Boomer’s Guide to Aging Parents, available at AgingParents.com, in ebook, print, or audio formats.

Family conflict brewing. It’s already rearing its head in the form of aggressive emails. One sister wants control of mom’s money and property. But she wasn’t the one mom appointed to be the durable power of attorney when the time came.

Now mom has dementia, and the time is here for someone to take over the finances. In fact, the daughter mom appointed (we’ll call her Phoebe) has been handling the money for two years now. What’s wrong?

Another daughter (we’ll call her Linda) looks as if she just wants to make mom’s care cost as little as possible so she can inherit more when mom dies. Shocking? No. We see it, unfortunately, fairly often. Linda wants to control that checkbook badly. She’s demanding to “help” Phoebe manage things.

Here’s the heart of the conflict: Phoebe is the properly appointed power of attorney, and mom chose her for mom’s own reasons. This was 15 years ago, and mom was completely competent at that time. Linda doesn’t like the idea, because Linda wants Phoebe to sell a house mom owns and keep the rental house mom also owns. The rental is worth a lot more than the other house. Several hundred thousand dollars more, even in today’s market.

Phoebe wants to sell the rental house, and keep mom’s home. Why? Because yet another sister is living in mom’s home and goes to see mom daily, and attends to her needs in assisted living, takes her out, and goes to the doctor with her. Mom needs that kind of care, as she has dementia. That sister, we’ll call Teresa.

What can Phoebe do? We suggested a family meeting with neutral mediators (ourselves), to see what Linda is willing to work out, and to see what Teresa can offer in the way of solutions.

Phoebe asked if Linda could “take her to court” if she disagreed with the way she was handling the funds mom has and the property. Answer: unless Phoebe is abusing her role as the agent for finances for mom, there is no way Linda would have a winning case against Phoebe. Disagreement with the agent is not enough.

Mediation could give the family the best chance of working out a solution which everyone could accept. Why can’t they do it without a mediator? Complicated situation, lots of issues no one talks about, and mom is going downhill fast lately. The sisters don’t get along. A mediator could help them get the matter settled among them.
Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, R.N., Attorney at Law, Mediator,
AgingParents.com.

To learn more about how to resolve disagreements like this one, see The Boomer’s Guide to Aging Parents, How to Handle Family Conflicts About Elders, available at http:/www.AgingParents.com/familyconflict, in print, ebook, or audiobook.

The thing about this kind of mediation practice is that, invariably, emotions are high. The dispute may not be about money, but sometimes it is. Money is emotional for lots of people. We find that families in dispute about their parents or other loved ones often fall back into patterns of behavior they have been in with each other since childhood. As immature as it seems, the players can’t seem to break the patterns. Some have observed that siblings even assume the same places around a table at mediation that they had at the family dinner table growing up. Talk about being stuck!

We find that for mediation to be successful for anyone, whether an elder is in the mix or not, one must be willing to give up one’s position, or to be able to view a problem from someone else’s point of view. Why this is so difficult seems to be rooted in the emotional attachment siblings, or others have to their Positions. (I’m right, I know I’m right, and I don’t care what you say!)

So, if one wants to mediate a dispute and has any hope of success, one has to come into the mediation willing to have some flexibility about the problem at hand. If one expects all the changing to be done by the person(s) on the other side of the dispute, it is a sure-fire way to fail at mediation.

Mediators work with participants to try to help them see things from each other’s point of view, but no one can force a person to compromise. A mediation is helped by participants who work at making “a deal”, whether it’s about money or about control, or a place to live, or whatever. Siblings fighting about their elders have a choice about whether to make their best effort to work it out, or to spend their time trying to make each other wrong. Likewise with the elders themselves. Some are just plain difficult, and compromise is not something they want to explore.

People have many reasons for holding onto their positions in family conflicts. Sometimes there are old resentments dating back to childhood. One mother who said she didn’t trust her son to manage her money wouldn’t give a reason until pressed. Her son was a responsible businessman, and likely could have done the job. He managed his own money responsibly, as reported by all and agreed to by the mom. As it turned out, he had gotten black oil on a favorite embroidered towel she had when he was a little boy, and that was her basis for not trusting him.

She was not about to give up her position. She had a very difficult time in her life, and though she made agreements at mediation, she spent a lot of time afterwards, we were told, undermining that to which she had agreed.

She’s a good example of a person who wasn’t likely to succeed at growing old gracefully. She also wasted thousands of dollars on attorneys, courts and got minimal value out of mediation. However, most of the time, mediation does work. People make agreements, they figure the way out of the mess. And sometimes it doesn’t, about 20% of the time. These are some of the reasons why it sometimes doesn’t work.

To learn more about how to handle family disputes, see How to Handle Family Conflicts About Elders, Vol. 7, The Boomer’s Guide to Aging Parents, available at http://www.AgingParents.com/familyconflict.